Showing posts with label Cricket World Cup. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cricket World Cup. Show all posts

30/04/2007

Crowe has nothing to crow about

Jeff Crowe was the blundering match referee at the heart of the farcical World Cup final . He once captained NZ.

Jeff has put up his hand admitting responsibility for the embarrassing cock-up in the final minutes of the game when the Aussies began jumping about like kangaroos thinking they had won the match and the umpires told them “its too early mates to celebrate”; which made Ricky Ponting tell umpire Aleem Dar “'Look mate, we've played the 20 overs, we've finished the game.'"

Crowe said: “In hindsight, I should have known the rules and said the game had been called off." All the same, he tried to shift the blame on the third umpire Rudi Koertzen as the one who “may have initiated the process leading to chaotic scenes at the climax of the game.”

How could Jeff have got it wrong, especially when he had elder brother Martin to turn to on matters relating to? Martin is the one who delivered the 2006 Colin Cowdrey lecture. In his lecture brother Martin spoke his mind against the use of technology to assist umpiring, except to determine such matters as line calls for run outs. He also slipped in some comments about his zero tolerance to chucking.
He said:
“I don’t care about talk of 15 degrees here or 10 degrees there… if with the naked eye a bowler is clearly chucking – even by 1 degree – he should be chucked out. Having it tested in a laboratory and not in match conditions is plain ignorance. To straighten your arm from any bent position is a massive advantage over other bowlers who bowl properly.”

Having been pinned in the head by ‘chuckers’ over 15 years, having been dubiously bowled first ball in a test by a certain Sri Lankan bowler, having tried to bowl a decent ball myself with a straight arm, I’ve had more than enough of this aspect of the game.”

It is time to show the same zero tolerance to referees who are ignorant of the rules. Jeff Crowe’s knowledge of the rules – or lack it- has been tested in match conditions and he has been found wanting. He must be chucked out.

23/04/2007

Sri Lanka v New Zealand


Semi final ICC World Cup

According to Simon Wilde 57% of all one-day internationals are won by the team batting second, and the figure is higher in matches in the West Indies.
[1] This has proved to be the case so far and as far as Sri Lankans are concerned they lost to South Africa and Australia when they batted first. Therefore, winning the toss will prove crucial.

Sri Lanka must be in a dilemma on whether to persist with out of form opener Upul Tharanga. Tharanga made 30 against Bermuda and 26 against Bangladesh but made a patient 64 against India. Just when it was thought that he had hit form he got out cheaply in the matches that followed.

In the end, Sri Lanka might want to take their chance with Tharanga in the hope that he would hit form at the right time. Marvin Atapattu, his possible replacement, has not had an outing so far and if the selectors were to give him the nod then it would also be more out of hope than on anything they have seen of Atapattu lately.

If Sri Lanka is to win tomorrow they will have to lift their game in two areas, (i) the top order batsman will have to score and (ii) they must avoid a collapse in the last ten overs. Much too often batsmen have fallen trying to hit the ball out of the ground when there were singles and twos for the taking.
[1] http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/cricket/article1467799.ece